Colin Watson wrote: >On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 01:55:28PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: >> It looks from >> http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=libsigc%2B%2B&expand=1 >> as though libsigc++ and the packages which depend on it are ready to go in, >> but have to be hinted together. > >They aren't ready yet; yehia/testing is still a problem, and upgrading Hmm. Really? It looks like yehia depends on libsigcx, but it also looks like libsigcx can survive an upgrade of libsigc++ (and all its other friends) without breaking. Which would certainly simplify things.
>that needs another complicated situation to be resolved first, namely >libgc. That's waiting for fixes to oo2c, stalin, stklos, and w3m. > >libsigc++ has been wedged solid since before I started paying attention >to these things back in May or June. :( -- Nathanael Nerode <neroden at gcc.gnu.org> http://home.twcny.rr.com/nerode/neroden/fdl.html
