* Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-09-29 22:47]: > but one of it's build-dep's is listed as: > -gimp1.2 (1.2.3-2.4 to -) > * Maintainer: Ben Gertzfield > * Valid candidate > so probably, it doesn't make sense to move it to testing, if gimp1.2 > is removed.
Actually, gimp1.2 still exists; there were two gimp1.2 packages and one got removed. Does testing cope with this? gimp1.2 | 1.2.3-2.4 | testing | source, alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc gimp1.2 | 1.2.5-3 | unstable | all -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
