On Apr 02, Martin Schulze wrote: > Chris Lawrence wrote: > > On Apr 01, Martin Schulze wrote: > > > latex2rtf stable 1.1-6 arm, m68k, powerpc > > > latex2rtf stable 1.8aa-2 alpha, i386, sparc > > > latex2rtf updates 1.8aa-4 alpha, arm, i386, sparc > > > > > > Changelog does not convince me to push it into stable: > > > > > > * Upload to stable to overcome the "can't build from source" bug that > > > breaks autobuild on some architectures. > > > > > > * Add build dependency on debhelper. > > > > > > m68k and powerpc missing > > > > > > Maintainer: Chris Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Basically, the problem with -2 in stable is that there is a spurious > > .o file in the archive (and it comes from upstream). > > It doesn't hurt for binary packages, I guess?
Well, it doesn't hurt if you are building for Intel, because it's an Intel object file, or if you manually removed the file during the build process (apparently the alpha and sparc maintainers did this to make the build work). > Ok, that explains it. Only because architectures are out of sync I'm > willing to let a new version in. That's good news; the 1.1 version for some architectures was definitely dated. Chris -- Chris Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - http://www.lordsutch.com/chris/ Instructor and Doctoral Student, Political Science, Univ. of Mississippi 208 Deupree Hall - 662-915-5949
