Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Wichert Akkerman wrote: > > Previously Philip Hands wrote: > > > Shouldn't that be 2.2 r1? > > > > The first revision will be 2.2r1 > > That's interesting -- there was no 2.1r1. See > ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/stable/ChangeLog which begins with > 2.1r2.
Exactly. This is the mistake I thought I'd try and make sure we didn't repeat, hence my mail. So just to make this clear, we're calling the releases as follows: 2.2 The thing that's definitely happening in a couple of weeks ;-) 2.2r1 The first revision, after the initial release 2.2r2 etc. Right? Cheers, Phil.
