Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> writes:

> FWIW, http://auric.debian.org/~ajt/potato_probs.html has similar lists,
> except it will choose whichever of perl or perl5 that works, and not
> worry that the other one doesn't. It also takes Conflicts into account.
> 
> On the downside, it doesn't care about priorities, and doesn't list
> explanations (it seems hard to work out what's at fault when conflicts
> are involved).

Still, it's an excellent list.  An, I think, an excellent basis for
filing RC bugs against all uninstallable packages.  Why didn't we do
this at the start of the freeze?

Am I alone in thinking that uninstallable pkgs should be yanked from
potato (at least for their arch) or else fixed?

And that RC bugs should be filed?

-- 
.....Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>

Reply via email to