Quoting Andreas Barth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > Things are much less likely to heat if you present them > > properly. > > Ok, convinced. No more minutes to debian-release. If we want to present > properly, we need to take time to polish the mails. Minutes will be > hidden in future to avoid misunderstandings. I hope that you'll be more > happy with that. I am desparate that this is necessary.
Well, I usually hate to AOLize, but it seems necessary here. Please don't do this because some do not understand what are minutes of a meeting. > > > You could have sent a short email to the debian-python mailing > > list, saying "we'd like to see this and that in the python policy", > > starting a constructive discussion. (Well, not all discussions become > > constructive, but you get a better chance this way.) > > Hello? Didn't you read? Let me repeat: We will communicate with the > teams. With each one. The minutes were not meant for that, they were > only meant internally for the release team. Please read my last mail. And the release team makes its actions and discussions public. Fairly logical again. As I understand, the meeting was public so one can even not send Kabal accusations (I bet that some will do anyway because there was a 30 minutes private discussion before). > > I'd be the wrong person to criticize IRC meetings. However we're talking > > about a policy which affects hundreds of packages; that's not something > > you can discuss in private with a few selected people. > > You mean, we're better of hiding discussions and results? Ok, your call. You said it, Andreas : *his* call. Don't let the most noisy people make you take the worst decisions.... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
