On Sun, Mar 27, 2005 at 09:41:53PM -0500, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> How strongly do you feel about having only one version of xerces in
> sarge?  If we have only one version, having it be xerces25 is
> definitely the easiest way to achieve that.

Supporting two versions of a library in stable is not unreasonable.  It's
the "three or more" scenario we have currently that bothers me.

-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to