Op vr, 11-03-2005 te 19:14 -0800, schreef Steve Langasek:
> The queue ordering is entirely automatic, and AIUI the queue(s) is (are)
> sorted by:
>
> - target suite
- previous compilation state (already built packages are prioritized
above packages never built for the target architecture)
> - package priority
> - package section
> - package name
>
> I personally believe it would be beneficial to prioritize by upload urgency
> as well (probably as a sort criterion between package priority and package
> section), but the w-b maintainers disagree.
I agree with the w-b maintainers. The queue order is only interesting in
the case where there is a backlog; in other cases, packages are usually
built rather fast. In the case where there is a backlog, those trying to
fix the architecture (usually those that are working on it) should be in
charge of deciding what package gets built first, not the maintainer of
a random package -- /all/ package builds are urgent if there's a
backlog.
--
EARTH
smog | bricks
AIR -- mud -- FIRE
soda water | tequila
WATER
-- with thanks to fortune
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
