Resending after bendel reject. :/ ----- Forwarded message from Maximiliano Curia <m...@debian.org> -----
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 09:16:50 +0100 From: Maximiliano Curia <m...@debian.org> To: Thorsten Alteholz <ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org> Cc: Debian/Kubuntu Qt/KDE Maintainers <debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170609 (1.8.3) Subject: Re: Comments regarding breeze-grub_5.10.3-1_amd64.changes ¡Hola Thorsten! El 2017-10-29 a las 16:29 +0000, Thorsten Alteholz escribió:
I marked the package for accept, but as the license of debian/* should be GPL-3+, the license text should not only point to GPL-3.
I'm not completely sure what's the extra requirement here.Are you requesting that the boiler plate of the license be added because it's related to files debian/* that have no other copyright/license assignment (so, following the GPL a boiler plate needs to be added)?
Or are you requesting that every time we use a specific version of a license in common-licenses we should also a add a text that explains the difference between the base license and the particular version in use?
Or is it because of something else?It's a subtle difference in this particular case, but I would like to know the rule that I'm requested to follow.
In the second case I would argue that GPL-3+ has no differences with the text in common-licenses/GPL-3.
In any case, I think that it would be worthwhile to add the specific requirement to the copyright format.
Happy hacking, -- "Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning." -- Rich Cook Saludos /\/\ /\ >< `/ ----- End forwarded message ----- -- "EIEIO Go home and have a glass of warm, dairy-fresh milk" -- The GNU C Library Reference Manual, Chapter 2.2, Error Codes Saludos /\/\ /\ >< `/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
