On 23/09/15 13:20, intrigeri wrote:
> intrigeri wrote (23 Sep 2015 11:08:16 GMT) :
>> maps/earth/{openstreetmap/openstreetmap,temp-july/temp-july}.dgml,
>
> I wonder if the license info in those map description files applies to
> the map data (that we don't ship in Debian anyway) and/or to the
> metadata.
>
> I suspect the former, as I have my doubts regarding whether these
> *.dgml files' content is "creative" enough to be copyrightable.
>
It looks like it applies to the map data, as per this commit:
https://quickgit.kde.org/?p=marble.git&a=blobdiff&h=7d8e2237061ef3e12ce4bd773b4ba9e411d43779&hp=b26e5e11579e0bac49f5b242a888cc8bb976bebf&f=data%2Fmaps%2Fearth%2Fopenstreetmap%2Fopenstreetmap.dgml&hb=61ea9ae19a00d83c5d0cfff6130cd84b9d853279
The DGML file itself was created by marble upstream contributors:
https://quickgit.kde.org/?p=marble.git&a=history&f=data%2Fmaps%2Fearth%2Fopenstreetmap%2Fopenstreetmap.dgml
so would have the same copyright as the main package.
Please can we just put these files back in now, and rm the unnecessary "+dfsg"
repacking? This exercise has not been very productive; any user looking for a
workaround can just download this file
https://quickgit.kde.org/?p=marble.git&a=blob&f=data%2Fmaps%2Fearth%2Fopenstreetmap%2Fopenstreetmap.dgml&o=plain
and put it in /usr/share/marble/data/maps/earth/openstreetmap
X
--
GPG: 4096R/1318EFAC5FBBDBCE
git://github.com/infinity0/pubkeys.git
