On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 11:18 PM, Adam D. Barratt <a...@adam-barratt.org.uk> wrote: > On Sat, 2012-08-11 at 22:43 +0800, YunQiang Su wrote: >> I update my system (Sid) just mow, and got some errors due to BinNUM of QT. > > and have you discussed this with the maintainers, who requested the > binNMU? (CCed) > >> I aware of the technical debate on multiarch and binnum, it seems that all >> guys >> there have their sufficient arguments. It's great technical debate, WHILE: >> >> The problem is there unsloved, and USERs are using my system, and >> We know exactly that the binnum of some packages will broken system >> certainly. > > There's no need to shout. It really doesn't help your point. > > If you're running a multi-user system and basing it on sid, you really > have to expect some breakage, multi-arch or not. > >> Why we still BinNMU these packages before this problem completely resolved? >> >> Must we? > > Well it avoids tying up several hours of buildd time on architectures > not affected by the issue the binNMU was scheduled for (i.e. 9/14). > I install both i386 and amd64, when I upgrade, both of them are built ok. etc, I upgrade i386 and amd64 at the same time. > Regards, > > Adam >
-- YunQiang Su -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cakcpw6v9rxq25ul6u5qsf3tipsasq+5yrf0t0bcuxembvwo...@mail.gmail.com
