severity 530532 normal thanks On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 11:34:33AM +0200, François Guerraz wrote: > I think that this package is in violation of Debian policy : > http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-files.html#s-config-files
Sorry but I beg to differ. It's strictly a missing feature that nobody implemented so far. /etc/ssl was intended for use with the system crypto libraries. OpenSSL supported it for a long time, then GnuTLS. NSS and stuff like QtNetwork do not use it. This is known and albeit annoying I don't see that this is a policy violation. Yes, nobody implemented configuration files for both NSS and QtNetwork. You can actually recompile them to ship with your own certs. But you cannot quote non-existent configuration files not being in /etc as a reason for a policy violation and hence upgrade it to serious, sorry. Kind regards Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
