Julien Cristau wrote: > Care to elaborate?
As I understand it: The Qt 3 part is a red herring. Bugs blocking removal of Qt 3 really should _not_ be release critical as long as there is someone willing to maintain Qt 3 itself. I'm not aware of an RFA, so... As for the KDE 3 part: to avoid user confusion and maintenance hassle, including KDE 3 in wheezy (at least unless someone else comes in and shows interest and competence at maintaining the beast) is not something the KDE maintainers consider an option. So packages which only work with KDE 3 need to be removed or ported to KDE 4. Those packages are mostly being removed already. As long as it gets taken care of quickly, I don't personally mind. And some people at #debian-qt-kde seemed to mind my meddling a lot. The status of KDE 3 removal is being tracked at http://wiki.debian.org/kdelibs4c2aRemoval and http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?users=debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org;tag=kde3libs-removal I didn't get a clear answer about what the preferred severity is for these bugs on IRC, so my reaction is to step away quietly... But given clear answers, I'd be glad to clean up my mess. Hope that helps, Jonathan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110227013919.GA21197@elie
