Andreas Barth píše v Út 10. 10. 2006 v 08:34 +0200: > Hi, > > just to repeat: If you want to do the poppler transition, it is *your* > task to check: > > * Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061005 21:22]: > > > - In any case, shouldn't we carefully check all affected packages, > > > whether they FTBFS and whether they still work? This would IMO > > > require a phase where all of them are in experimental, except poppler > > > itself in case it gets a new dev package name. > > > > Yes, given the current release schedule, this new libpoppler transition will > > only be considered for etch if someone does rebuild and test all the > > reverse-dependencies, providing any necessary patches and documenting these > > to the release team. > > Given the current date, I don't expect the poppler transition to happen, > unless that happens very fast. And even in that case, please speak with > us before uploading the package to unstable.
Considering my work schedule atm, let's postpone this transition to etch +1, so we have more time to do it right. Ondrej. -- Ondřej Surý <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
