On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 06:38:10PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > Le lun 25 septembre 2006 15:11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : > > Hi, further to my mail yesterday about the broken dependency of > > kcontrol on libraw1394-5, please find below a message sent to the > > libraw1394 maintainer and his answer.
> > Is there a way to improve coordination amongst Debian maintainers and > > stop this finger-pointing attitude? > there is no finger pointing going on. kdebase needs a binNMU (a rebuild) > to be built against the last version of the libraw1394. A thing that > ludovic should have asked for every reverse depends of that library. > > A user. > But I'm partly responsible of this because I forgot to ask him to look > into this, and I was his sponsor for the libraw1394 package (here > speaking with my KDE packager hat on). > ==== > libraw1394 transition, the following 5 packages still have a Depends > upon libraw1397-5: > Package: gstreamer0.10-plugins-good > Package: kcontrol > Package: lynkeos.app > Package: motion > Package: wengophone There are actually quite a number of other packages still having this dependency, though perhaps not all on the architecture you were looking at. Anyway, except for kdebase and gst-plugins-good0.10, which were deferred on account of some other lib transitions, these packages were all scheduled for binNMUs -- but a lot of them failed for one reason or another. Those that could be given back have been given back, leaving only three packages not being rebuild: lynkeos.app, which needs updated for the (spurious) gnustep -dev name change; wengophone, which FTBFS with a problem in its install target; and motion, which FTBFS with bug #389304. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
