Note that the freeze cutoff for cdbs is approaching, so we need an idea on this really quickly.
Am Sonntag, 30. Juli 2006 22:19 schrieb Peter Eisentraut: > Christopher Martin wrote: > > Notice how debian/patches/04_am_maintainer_mode.diff is skipped > > because "it's already applied" even though it clearly isn't? There is > > a similarly named but different patch, > > debian/patches/common/04_am_maintainer_mode.diff, which is perhaps > > confusing CDBS. > > We need a per-patch stamp file to fix various other misbehaviors, which > is why this sort of setup is out of luck. Apparently someone thought > that the actual patch directory should be read-only, so devising a > patch stamp naming scheme that can handle this is a bit tricky. > > Currently we have > > $(call cdbs_update_stamp,debian/stamp-patch-$$(basename $$patch)) > > Considering that the patch directory can be chosen arbitrarily (a > feature that you make use of), we can't just stick the directory name > in there. > > Anyone got an idea? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
