Your message dated Wed, 22 Jan 2025 23:35:01 +0100
with message-id <7763240.EvYhyI6sBW@grummly>
and subject line
has caused the Debian Bug report #1061689,
regarding kdevelop512-libs: identified for time_t transition but no ABI in
shlibs
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
1061689: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1061689
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: kdevelop512-libs
Version: 4:23.08.1-2
Severity: serious
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Hi Pino,
Analysis of the archive for the 64-bit time_t transition[0][1] identifies
kdevelop512-libs as an affected package, on the basis that the headers could
not be compiled and analyzed out of the box using abi-compliance-checker[2],
so we have to assume it's affected.
However, kdevelop512-libs's shlibs file declares a dependency on a library
package name that contains no ABI information:
$ cat DEBIAN/shlibs
libKDevPlatformDebugger 512 kdevelop512-libs (>= 4:23.08.1)
libKDevPlatformDocumentation 512 kdevelop512-libs (>= 4:23.08.1)
libKDevPlatformInterfaces 512 kdevelop512-libs (>= 4:23.08.1)
libKDevPlatformLanguage 512 kdevelop512-libs (>= 4:23.08.1)
libKDevPlatformOutputView 512 kdevelop512-libs (>= 4:23.08.1)
libKDevPlatformProject 512 kdevelop512-libs (>= 4:23.08.1)
libKDevPlatformSerialization 512 kdevelop512-libs (>= 4:23.08.1)
libKDevPlatformShell 512 kdevelop512-libs (>= 4:23.08.1)
libKDevPlatformSublime 512 kdevelop512-libs (>= 4:23.08.1)
libKDevPlatformUtil 512 kdevelop512-libs (>= 4:23.08.1)
libKDevPlatformVcs 512 kdevelop512-libs (>= 4:23.08.1)
$
It is therefore not obvious that we should rename the package to
'kdevelop512-libs-t64' as part of this transition.
Looking at the archive, there are packages that depend on these libraries
built from other source packages, kdevelop-php and kdevelop-python.
Since there is no self-evident thing to do with the library package name
here, we will not be handling this package as part of the mass NMUs.
Instead I am filing a serious bug because partial upgrades from bookworm to
trixie on 32-bit architectures will result in ABI skew and may result in
broken behavior.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer https://www.debian.org/
slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org
[0] https://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/64bit-time
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2024/01/msg00041.html
[2]
https://adrien.dcln.fr/misc/armhf-time_t/2024-01-17/logs/kdevelop-dev/base/log.txt
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
control: fixed -1 4:24.12.0-1
With the Qt6 port shipped in 4:24.12.0-1 all the libraries got a soname bump so
I’m closing this bug.
Thanks,
--
Aurélien
--- End Message ---
