Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 11:56:21 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#340704: rar support violates DFSG #4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Nov 2005 10:16:00 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 25 02:16:00 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 216.red-62-57-140.user.auna.net ([62.57.140.216]
helo=khazad.dyndns.org)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1Efaca-00054M-H9
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 02:16:00 -0800
Received: from rmh by khazad.dyndns.org with local (Exim 4.54)
id 1EfacU-0002Md-W8; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 11:15:55 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: rar support violates DFSG #4
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 11:15:54 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: ark
Severity: serious
Justification: DFSG #4
This package has a "Suggests: rar" tag. If it has the functionality to create
rar archives via rar, this is a serious problem, because it is encouraging users
to create "trap archives" that can't be extracted with free software. I believe
this is a violation of DFSG #4 ("Our priorities are our users and free
software") since we put:
- A minority of our users (those who use rar to publish data).
before:
- The majority of our users (who can't extract the data in a pure Debian
system).
- The free software community, for which trap archive formats are seriously
detrimental.
OTOH, if this package is only using rar to extract these archives, then it'd be
better to use the unrar package instead (in that case severity of this bug
should be lowered).
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-k7
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) (ignored: LC_ALL
set to C)
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 340704-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Nov 2005 10:58:04 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 25 02:58:04 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from outmx011.isp.belgacom.be ([195.238.3.3])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EfbHI-0007Qd-JB
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 02:58:04 -0800
Received: from outmx011.isp.belgacom.be (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by outmx011.isp.belgacom.be (8.12.11/8.12.11/Skynet-OUT-2.22) with
ESMTP id jAPAvwMj029224
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 11:57:58 +0100
(envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
Received: from [192.168.2.3] (78.15-200-80.adsl.skynet.be [80.200.15.78])
by outmx011.isp.belgacom.be (8.12.11/8.12.11/Skynet-OUT-2.22) with
ESMTP id jAPAvpht029144
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 11:57:51 +0100
(envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 11:56:21 +0100
From: Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051017)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#340704: rar support violates DFSG #4
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.0.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER,
RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Robert Millan wrote:
> Package: ark
> Severity: serious
> Justification: DFSG #4
>
> This package has a "Suggests: rar" tag. If it has the functionality to create
> rar archives via rar, this is a serious problem, because it is encouraging
> users
> to create "trap archives" that can't be extracted with free software. I
> believe
> this is a violation of DFSG #4 ("Our priorities are our users and free
> software") since we put:
Note that it's only a "Suggests", so the package doesn't need rar to
work properly. I don't see why you think it encourages users to use rar,
nor why we should make it harder for them to use these archives if they
choose to use it.
> - A minority of our users (those who use rar to publish data).
>
> before:
>
> - The majority of our users (who can't extract the data in a pure Debian
> system).
> - The free software community, for which trap archive formats are seriously
> detrimental.
This would only be the case if ark's main focus was working on rar
archives and especially building rar archives, which is not the case.
You do know that you *can* also use other free software to discriminate
users for whatever reason...
> OTOH, if this package is only using rar to extract these archives, then it'd
> be
> better to use the unrar package instead (in that case severity of this bug
> should be lowered).
I don't see any reason why this Suggests would not comply with policy as
only Depends and Recommends should be in main and the package works
properly without the rar command (though you need rar if you want to
work with rar archives). Note that the unrar package does only exist in
oldstable (woody/non-free), so this would not solve anything!
I'm closing this bug as it can only be a wishlist bug IMHO.
Cheers
Luk
PS: You are talking about DFSG #5 while calling it DFSG #4...
PS2: Feel free to reopen this bug with a wishlist severity.
- --
Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D
Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDhu295UTeB5t8Mo0RAtKcAJ45r6qU+Ix78jrDCmS4G542drl/6wCfVtTD
mH9CmkL+qYZ2XtVB7gsY+6A=
=C66p
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
