Your message dated Sun, 29 Aug 2004 21:42:08 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed upstream
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Dec 2001 21:34:13 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 05 15:34:13 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (twinny.dyndns.org) [62.47.19.42] 
        by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 16BjgC-0003y4-00; Wed, 05 Dec 2001 15:34:12 -0600
Received: (qmail 5090 invoked from network); 5 Dec 2001 21:46:21 -0000
Received: from oland.twinny.at (HELO there) ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  by n602p010.adsl.highway.telekom.at with SMTP; 5 Dec 2001 21:46:21 -0000
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Thomas Winischhofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: daemon ignores events on USB input devices
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 22:29:13 +0100
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: klaptopdaemon
Version: 2.2.2-5
Severity: Important

KDE's laptop daemon currently ignores events coming from USB devices 
which makes it unusable on systems using USB input devices only; the 
obvious result is that the daemon will initiate a suspend event 
although the user uses the mouse or types on the keyboard.

The bug is more a design flaw as the daemon currently checks for input 
activity by parsing /proc/interrupts, searching for the keywords 
"[K|k]eyboard" and "[M|m]ouse" and checking whether or not an 
interrupt on their irq lines has occurred since the last poll. USB 
devices do not show up as such in /proc/interrupts but as "usb-ohci" 
(or whatever driver you use) and possibly share interrupts with other 
devices (such as sound in my case). Bad method. There must be a way of 
linking itself into X's input event handlers and do the checking there.

This said, I still consider it by all means important rather than a 
wishlist item. Many people use their laptop computers at home in 
combination with external - USB, that is - input devices (who likes to 
fuzz with a small mousepad or dislocated keys on a literally weak 
keyboard?). 

Thomas

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 122607-done) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Aug 2004 19:42:09 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 29 12:42:09 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 84-120-69-105.onocable.ono.com (chistera.yi.org) [84.120.69.105] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1C1VZ3-0005Lf-00; Sun, 29 Aug 2004 12:42:09 -0700
Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.34) 
          id 1C1VZ2-0001qe-4v
          for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 29 Aug 2004 21:42:08 +0200
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 21:42:08 +0200
From: Adeodato =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sim=F3?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: fixed upstream
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-No-CC: Please respect my Mail-Followup-To header
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040818i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 


  upstream claims this is fixed since kde 3.2.

-- 
Adeodato Simó
    EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621
 
Loan-department manager:  "There isn't any fine print.  At these
interest rates, we don't need it."

Reply via email to