Your message dated Sun, 15 Aug 2004 16:26:00 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line oops, already existing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Aug 2004 10:59:25 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 15 03:59:25 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from lns-th2-5f-81-56-227-253.adsl.proxad.net (kheops.homeunix.org)
[81.56.227.253]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BwIjV-00041V-00; Sun, 15 Aug 2004 03:59:25 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by kheops.homeunix.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 31A80405D; Sun, 15 Aug 2004 12:58:53 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from kheops.homeunix.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (kheops [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 18929-10; Sun, 15 Aug 2004 12:58:46 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org (mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org
[192.168.1.3])
by kheops.homeunix.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 8EAB64050; Sun, 15 Aug 2004 12:58:46 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org [127.0.0.1])
by mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69BC02328A;
Sun, 15 Aug 2004 12:58:46 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (mykerinos [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 16264-04; Sun, 15 Aug 2004 12:58:45 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org (Postfix, from userid 7426)
id CABB323275; Sun, 15 Aug 2004 12:58:45 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: openoffice.org-mimelnk: Could not upgrade to latest release because of
file
conflicting
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.64
Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2004 12:58:45 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at mykerinos
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at kheops.frmug.org
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: openoffice.org-mimelnk
Version: 1.1.2-3
Severity: important
I hope this hasn't already been reported...IF so, sorry for this : I found
no trace in the BTS but did not check deeply, though.
I prefer reporting than ignoring...we're in a release process, after all..:-)
Unpacking replacement openoffice.org-mimelnk ...
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/openoffice.org-mimelnk_1.1.2-3_all.deb (--unpack):
trying to overwrite
/usr/share/mimelnk/application/vnd.stardivision.calc.desktop', which is also
in package kdelibs-data
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.7-1-686
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (ignored: LC_ALL set to
fr_FR.UTF-8)
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 265875-done) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Aug 2004 14:26:12 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 15 07:26:12 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from pop.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net) [213.165.64.20]
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BwLxc-0000Y2-00; Sun, 15 Aug 2004 07:26:12 -0700
Received: (qmail 30957 invoked by uid 65534); 15 Aug 2004 14:25:40 -0000
Received: from p50921423.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO localhost) (80.146.20.35)
by mail.gmx.net (mp005) with SMTP; 15 Aug 2004 16:25:40 +0200
X-Authenticated: #1545045
Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 8F55FA391A; Sun, 15 Aug 2004 16:26:00 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2004 16:26:00 +0200
From: Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: oops, already existing
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="AGZzQgpsuUlWC1xT"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-PGP-Key: 248AEB73
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
--AGZzQgpsuUlWC1xT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,
oh, I just saw the Replaces: is there, again broken changelogs make
nothing clear....
Gr=FC=DFe/Regards,
Ren=E9
--=20
.''`. Ren=E9 Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
`- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
=20
--AGZzQgpsuUlWC1xT
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBH3J4+FmQsCSK63MRAqINAJ47KwI4rlVVXFq5q4ryoGUvhQ5zaQCdF1wf
i37gqtXNObfLgSWdVgol4fQ=
=l7A1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--AGZzQgpsuUlWC1xT--
