Your message dated Wed, 24 Mar 2004 19:58:59 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line problem went away for submitter
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Mar 2004 13:51:53 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 11 05:51:53 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mailout10.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.21]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1B1QbJ-0005j4-00; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 05:51:53 -0800
Received: from fwd08.aul.t-online.de
by mailout10.sul.t-online.com with smtp
id 1B1QbH-00052V-03; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 14:51:51 +0100
Received: from firewall.derlipper.local ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) by
fwd08.sul.t-online.com
with esmtp id 1B1Qaw-1tSMDI0; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 14:51:30 +0100
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by localhost.derlipper.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B8EB1FEB3
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 14:51:30 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firewall.derlipper.local ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (firewall [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 02579-10 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Thu, 11 Mar 2004 14:51:21 +0100 (CET)
Received: from t-online.de (unknown [192.168.1.4])
by firewall.derlipper.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26D8B1FEAE
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 14:51:21 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 14:52:50 +0100
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marko Kaiser)
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (X11/20040306)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: No more Konqueror icons in kde panel after upgrade
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.83.2.0
X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p7 (Debian) at derlipper.local
X-Seen: false
X-ID: GcGcEZZb8eTrbSS0Yt8nHetI+Lkr2Syk-9OOblsmet2Gz5GZ8g5QEB
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_08
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_08
X-Spam-Level:
Subject: no more konqueror icons in kde panel after upgrade
Package: konqueror
Version: 4:3.2.1-1
Severity: normal
*** Please type your report below this line ***
Hi,
after upgrading my system to KDE 3.2.1 the KDE panel is missing some
konq. icons. If I click on them an error arises complaining that
a Type=... block is missing in /usr/share/applnk/konqueror.desktop
The same error applies to the online help and konsole.
Best regards,
Marko Kaiser
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.2
Locale: LANG=de_DE, LC_CTYPE=de_DE (ignored: LC_ALL set to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Versions of packages konqueror depends on:
ii kcontrol 4:3.2.1-1 KDE Control Center
ii kdebase-kio-plugins 4:3.2.1-1 KDE I/O Slaves
ii kdelibs4 4:3.2.1-1 KDE core libraries
ii kdesktop 4:3.2.1-1 KDE Desktop
ii kfind 4:3.2.1-1 KDE File Find Utility
ii libart-2.0-2 2.3.16-1 Library of functions for 2D
graphi
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-11 GNU C Library: Shared
libraries an
ii libfam0c102 2.7.0-5 client library to control
the FAM
ii libgcc1 1:3.3.3-2 GCC support library
ii libice6 4.3.0-5 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii libjpeg62 6b-9 The Independent JPEG
Group's JPEG
ii libkonq4 4:3.2.1-1 Core libraries for KDE's
file mana
ii libpcre3 4.5-1 Perl 5 Compatible Regular
Expressi
ii libpng12-0 1.2.5.0-5 PNG library - runtime
ii libqt3c102-mt 3:3.2.3-2 Qt GUI Library (Threaded
runtime v
ii libsm6 4.3.0-5 X Window System Session
Management
ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.3-2 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii libx11-6 4.3.0-5 X Window System protocol
client li
ii libxext6 4.3.0-5 X Window System
miscellaneous exte
ii libxrender1 0.8.3-7 X Rendering Extension
client libra
ii xlibs 4.3.0-5 X Window System client
libraries m
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.1-4 compression library - runtime
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 237420-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Mar 2004 00:53:34 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 24 16:53:34 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from cp2.myhostdns.org [64.5.40.22]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1B6J7m-0001pv-00; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 16:53:34 -0800
Received: from adsl-68-77-162-81.dsl.sfldmi.ameritech.net ([68.77.162.81]
helo=[192.168.0.254])
by cp2.myhostdns.org with asmtp (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128)
(Exim 4.24)
id 1B6J7q-0002GF-9i
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 18:53:38 -0600
From: Josh Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: problem went away for submitter
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 19:58:59 -0500
User-Agent: KMail/1.6.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any
abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - cp2.myhostdns.org
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - bugs.debian.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - metzlers.org
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_12
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_12
X-Spam-Level:
after an update the problem went away for the submitter.
Josh
