Your message dated Mon, 09 Feb 2004 18:07:50 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#203722: How to handle the -mieee SIGFPE problem in normal
Debian packages
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Aug 2003 01:55:31 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 31 20:55:29 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from gesundheit.complete.org [65.248.4.18]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19iP8j-00012a-00; Thu, 31 Jul 2003 20:55:29 -0500
Received: by gesundheit.complete.org (Postfix, from userid 108)
id 15A941832033; Thu, 31 Jul 2003 20:55:33 -0500 (CDT)
X-Scanned-By: clamscan at complete.org
Received: from erwin.complete.org (unknown [12.149.180.20])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "erwin.complete.org", Issuer "John Goerzen -- Root CA"
(verified OK))
by gesundheit.complete.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31BAF1832036
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 31 Jul 2003 20:55:28 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by erwin.complete.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 7F4127583E; Thu, 31 Jul 2003 20:55:09 -0500 (CDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: konqueror: *Frequent* SIGFPE on Alpha
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.18
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 20:55:09 -0500
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_20,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: konqueror
Version: 4:3.1.3-1
Severity: important
This package has, for the past several versions at least, caused SIGFPE for
numerous sites. One example for me is www.dilbert.com. It is 100%
repeatable for any such site.
The backtrace tab yields:
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
In other words, nothing useful.
-- John
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: alpha
Kernel: Linux erwin 2.4.20 #1 Sat Jun 7 16:26:40 CDT 2003 alpha
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages konqueror depends on:
ii kate 4:3.1.3-1 KDE Advanced Text Editor
ii kcontrol 4:3.1.2-1 KDE Control Center
ii kdelibs4 4:3.1.3-1 KDE core libraries
ii kfind 4:3.1.2-1 KDE File Find Utility
ii libart-2.0-2 2.3.12-1 Library of functions for 2D graphi
ii libc6.1 2.3.1-17 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libfam0c102 2.6.10-1 client library to control the FAM
ii libgcc1 1:3.3.1-0rc2 GCC support library
ii libjpeg62 6b-8 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG
ii libkonq4 4:3.1.3-1 Core libraries for KDE's file mana
ii libpcre3 4.3-3 Philip Hazel's Perl 5 Compatible R
ii libpng12-0 1.2.5.0-4 PNG library - runtime
ii libqt3c102-mt 3:3.1.1-8 Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v
ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.1-0rc2 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii libxrender1 0.8.2-1 X Rendering Extension client libra
ii xlibs 4.2.1-9 X Window System client libraries
ii zlib1g 1:1.1.4-13 compression library - runtime
-- debconf information:
* konqueror/crypto:
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 203722-done) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Feb 2004 17:06:58 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 09 09:06:58 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from spoetnik.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be [134.58.240.46]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AqEs5-0002xl-00; Mon, 09 Feb 2004 09:06:58 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by spoetnik.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP
id B70CE34171; Mon, 9 Feb 2004 18:06:26 +0100 (CET)
Received: from antonius.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (antonius.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be
[134.58.240.73])
by spoetnik.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 4AF68340B9; Mon, 9 Feb 2004 18:06:26 +0100 (CET)
Received: from appel (domi.kotnet.org [10.0.57.168])
by antonius.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 355EC4C33E; Mon, 9 Feb 2004 18:06:26 +0100 (CET)
Received: from domi by appel with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1AqEsw-0007wp-00; Mon, 09 Feb 2004 18:07:50 +0100
To: Falk Hueffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#203722: How to handle the -mieee SIGFPE problem in normal
Debian packages
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Dominique Devriese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 18:07:50 +0100
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Falk Hueffner's
message of "09 Feb 2004 17:17:39 +0100")
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) XEmacs/21.4 (Reasonable Discussion,
linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: Dominique Devriese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: by KULeuven Antivirus Cluster
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01
X-Spam-Level:
Falk Hueffner writes:
> Dominique Devriese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I'm currently looking at the following bug report
>> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=203722 about a
>> frequent SIGFPE on an alpha machine. I guess we all know the cause
>> of this bug, namely the non-standard alpha FPU semantics.
>> 4 wait for the gcc alpha patch to be included into gcc, which was
>> posted on this list recently.
> It has been added to the newest gcc (but not upstream), so the
> problem should magically go away all by itself.
Ok, great. I'm closing the bug report then.
thanks
domi
