tags 292401 +upstream forwarded 292401 http://bugs.kde.org/86650 thanks
On Wednesday 26 January 2005 10:30 pm, Chris Cheney wrote: > On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 05:03:45PM -0500, Christopher Martin wrote: > > To fix this, we'd need either to ship a kdmrc that conforms to the > > kcontrol configurator's basic pattern, and so wouldn't be modified by > > kcontrol more than is really necessary (could we make it keep the > > comments, at least?), or else re-write the kdm module of kcontrol to > > behave less stupidly, which would be quite an undertaking. > > > > Comments? > > Perhaps this is a bug that would be useful forwarded upstream, hopefully > the upstream authors just overlooked the fact that it mangles the config > file and it is not a "feature". ;) > > Chris I just checked and this bug was reported upstream a few months ago, and it sounds like a fix might be possible. Josh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
