On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 11:41:07AM +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Sat, May 23, 2020 at 11:15:14AM +0000, Paul Wise wrote: > > On Sat, May 23, 2020 at 9:56 AM Bill Allombert wrote: > > > > > "Package has a Suggests on pari-gp-dbgsym which cannot be satisfied on > > > amd64" > > > > > > However pari-gp-dbgsym exists in buster-debug > > > > > > So is it a debcheck bug or something that can be fixed in the package ? > > > > It is a bug in debcheck, it does not yet know about the debian-debug > > archive. > > Well, I'd argue that the message is correct. > > The Policy allows Suggests against non-existing packages, so the > situation is alright, but you are in fact suggestion a package that is > outside of the "main" debian archive.
The debug version of main is still main at least as far as the DFSG is concerned. > Even if debcheck learnt about the debian-debug archive, I'd still > consider a package from the main archive having Suggests to a package > from the debug archive something weird. So are you suggesting I move pari-gp-dbgsym back to main ? Would the FTP masters allow that ? (pari-gp-dbgsym used to be named pari-gp-dbg and be in main). Cheers, -- Bill. <ballo...@debian.org> Imagine a large red swirl here.
