Hello all, I was checking the version of libc++ in Debian archive [1] and found that package "libc++" failed to migrate to testing in last three years.
While checking for migration excuses, I found that the statement of excuse is
kind of weird. Currently it says: [2]
Excuse for libc++
Migration status: BLOCKED: Rejected/introduces a regression (please see
below)
Too young, only 0 of 5 days old
missing build on armel: libc++-dev, libc++-helpers, libc++-test, libc++1,
libc++abi-dev, libc++abi-test, libc++abi1 (from 3.9.1-2)
missing build on armhf: libc++-dev, libc++-helpers, libc++-test, libc++1,
libc++abi-dev, libc++abi-test, libc++abi1 (from 3.9.0-1)
missing build on mips: libc++-dev, libc++-helpers, libc++-test, libc++1,
libc++abi-dev, libc++abi-test, libc++abi1 (from 3.9.1-3)
missing build on mips64el: libc++-dev, libc++-helpers, libc++-test, libc+
+1, libc++abi-dev, libc++abi-test, libc++abi1 (from 3.9.0-1)
missing build on mipsel: libc++-dev, libc++-helpers, libc++-test, libc++1,
libc++abi-dev, libc++abi-test, libc++abi1 (from 3.9.1-3)
missing build on ppc64el: libc++-dev, libc++-helpers, libc++-test, libc+
+1, libc++abi-dev, libc++abi-test, libc++abi1 (from 3.9.1-3)
missing build on s390x: libc++-dev, libc++-helpers, libc++-test, libc++1,
libc++abi-dev, libc++abi-test, libc++abi1 (from 3.9.1-3)
libc++ has new bugs!
Updating libc++ introduces new bugs: #870440
Piuparts tested OK - https://piuparts.debian.org/sid/source/libc/libc+
+.html
Not considered
Bug #870040 has been fixed for a while [3] yet the excuse still mentions it.
I think it might be a bug in QA scripts. Could you please look into it and
make the excuse correct (which is FTBFS on certain architectures, not
introducing new bugs)?
Thanks,
Boyuan Yang
[1] https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/libc++
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=libc%2B%2B
[3] https://bugs.debian.org/870440
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
