On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 1:32 PM, Johannes Schauer wrote: > Correct. My motivation to add this was something I forgot to mention in my > initial report, but this is just an implementation detail: dose3 outputs its > results in yaml format. Implementation wise, it would be easiest if > qa.d.o/dose > would just dump the raw data that dose3 generates in its own output format > without any further processing. That data then would of course not include any > urls and that's why I mentioned the stable URLs.
I think for the tracker we would want a custom format, in case the dose3 raw data format/schema changes. > I am fighting with "human-readable results pages" myself for years (See > http://bootstrap.debian.net/cross.html for example) and found that the > graphical display that Ralf created for qa.d.o/dose is superior to any other > that I have ever seen so far (including the Perl implementation on qa.d.o > which > does not give me a proper explanation of the problem). If you know a more > "human readable" solution to display complex situations like this: > > https://qa.debian.org/dose/debcheck/src_unstable_main/1437022805/packages/apertium-eo-ca.html If that page mentioned Depends/Build-Depends/etc instead of using arrows it might be more understandable. Also a proper graph ouput with graphviz might be more understandable. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/caktje6ezj2fbvfcrj_xhxt0xobmqsjydw6ukdix40cjfraw...@mail.gmail.com
