Your message dated Wed, 18 Mar 2015 16:19:38 +0100 with message-id <20150318151937.ga18...@xanadu.blop.info> and subject line Re: Bug#461898: qa.debian.org: per-maintainer TODO page has caused the Debian Bug report #461898, regarding qa.debian.org: per-maintainer TODO page to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 461898: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=461898 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: qa.debian.org Severity: wishlist DDPO is great, but I would like to see a per-maintainer "TODO" page. The reason I want this is DDPO doesn't make it easy to see what needs doing since it just shows status info for all the packages. Below are some thoughts that might be a good starting point. * per-maintainer, since we have the PTS for a per-package TODO * support configurable prioritisation by maintainers, including by todo type (bugs/lintian/dehs/buildd), todo severity (lintian errors/warning/info or RC/important/normal/wishlist bugs), package has co-maintainers * have info from DDPO, but in a more compact way; "fix A RC bugs", "fix B lintian errors", "upload C new upstreams", "chase up D submitted bugs", "sponsor E packages on mentors". -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---On 21/01/08 at 20:58 +0900, Paul Wise wrote: > Package: qa.debian.org > Severity: wishlist > > DDPO is great, but I would like to see a per-maintainer "TODO" page. The > reason I want this is DDPO doesn't make it easy to see what needs doing > since it just shows status info for all the packages. > > Below are some thoughts that might be a good starting point. > > * per-maintainer, since we have the PTS for a per-package TODO > * support configurable prioritisation by maintainers, including by > todo type (bugs/lintian/dehs/buildd), todo severity (lintian > errors/warning/info or RC/important/normal/wishlist bugs), > package has co-maintainers > * have info from DDPO, but in a more compact way; "fix A RC bugs", > "fix B lintian errors", "upload C new upstreams", "chase up D > submitted bugs", "sponsor E packages on mentors". Hi, All the ideas mentioned in this bug have been implemented in the Debian Maintainer Dashboard: http://udd.debian.org/dmd/ So I'm now (finally) closing this bug! - Lucas
--- End Message ---
