Hi, On Montag, 1. Dezember 2014, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > OK, those are legitimate concerns (and blockers for your use cases, > IIUC), but they are unrelated to the actual timeline for shutting down > the old PTS.
yes & yes
> That is to say: you are not migrating "your" links for
> reasons other than "the tracker hasn't been officially blessed as PTS
> replacement yet", right?
well, that and because of these bugs the new tracker breaks my habbits, so I'm
reluctant for selfish^wpersonal reasons too.
> I have no idea if someone is maintaining a list of legitimate "blockers"
> that are inhibiting a complete migration to the new tracker (including a
> shutdown of the old one). My tentative answer about this would be "no
> one is doing that", but I might be wrong. Personally, I certainly
> consider the new tracker good enough and I've stopped using the old PTS
> long ago. The main reason for keeping around the old PTS, at least for
> me, is currently in the realm of "let's give people enough time to
> migrate their links, habits, etc".
/me nods. I think such a list of blockers would be useful, but I'm not going
to do it...
> In the meantime, if people have migration blockers, the best way forward
> is providing patches :) ; and the second best let this list know (as you
> just did).
..as I also don't have time to provide patches here, mostly due to lack of
time but also because CSS is not my favorite programming language ;)
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
