Guillem Jover wrote: > I don't think this makes much sense at all in its current form. It does > not mention the word Ubuntu anymore, but all information is very Ubuntu > specific, number of bugs/patches, comparison of Ubuntu releases against > sid, and Launchpad links. Or this message, which could do with a > rewording :) regardless of the missing Ubuntu there: > > “Packages with the same version in utopic and Debian sid, no bugs > and no patches are not listed.”
I agree that sentence is difficult to get, moreover i think we should keep all packages in the list (coloring in green those who do not seem to require any action). > I mean, yes the “unholy” Ubuntu word has been eradicated, and that > might give peace to some people, but as it stands the panel tries > to be generic and ends up being just confusing. > > I'd say the Ubuntu word needs to be reintroduced in several places, and > allow for either the Ubuntu or the entire Derivatives section to be > hidden or shown by default to placate the participants in this thread. We only changed the title of the section from Ubuntu to Derivatives, now you are right there should be a subsection for each derivatives we want to track. I understand I should not have closed this bug, as commercial brands are offending some of us. I failed reopening it because it is archived. I would rather avoid asking users what should be hidden (and let them read what they want to) but that is probably the best option here. Cheers, Christophe -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140805155348.GA18893@atitude.localdomain
