Andrei POPESCU <andreimpope...@gmail.com> writes: > For this concrete case, might I suggest following course of action:
> 1. ping all submitters of emacs21 (and related) bugs to test against > recent emacs (at a minimum emacs23 from wheezy) and deal with the bug as > needed > 2. if no response within a reasonable amount of time (3 months?) > mass-close them > According to my script this applies to 162 bugs, of which some are in > the 5 (five) digit range and only 1 (one) bug number is higher than > 500000. List attached. If everyone reading this who uses Emacs (probably a lot of people!) takes a moment to do a bit of triage on the list you posted (thank you!), we could make most of this go away, actually. I started doing that since I was curious how easy it would be and was able to resolve five or six bugs as previously fixed in just a few minutes. I'll do a bit more of that this morning before I have to go do other work. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/871tvv13pz....@windlord.stanford.edu
