Hi,
On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 04:17:54AM +1200, Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 03:42:06PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 03:22:24PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > On 03/06/13 at 14:20 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I checked whether the columns starzing with experimental_* might contain
> > > > any content:
> > > >
> > > > udd=# SELECT distinct experimental_version, experimental_upstream,
> > > > experimental_parsed_version, experimental_status,
> > > > experimental_last_uptodate from dehs ;
> > > > experimental_version | experimental_upstream |
> > > > experimental_parsed_version | experimental_status |
> > > > experimental_last_uptodate
> > > > ----------------------+-----------------------+-----------------------------+---------------------+----------------------------
> > > > | |
> > > > | |
> > > > (1 row)
>
> There is one row returned. NULLs?
or '' - whatever. *All* rows of the whole table are featuring the very
same value - so it is simply not filled.
> > All columns are empty for the whole DEHS table.
>
> Am I reading it wrong?
It is right that there is exactly one row returned but if you query for
s/experimental/unstable/g
you get *results*.
If Lucas is right that we do not care about these columns - why not
droping these?
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130605115059.gg20...@an3as.eu
