On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 02:14:24PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > Given that it's reporting failures, personally I'd kind of like to have it > in todo, but maybe there aren't enough people who are interested yet?
The "traditional" way for that kind of things in the PTS was to have both. More precisely: - have links on the right if they have something to say about the package (i.e. have the clang link iff the clang toolchain has operated on the package) - have warnings/todos in the central column if there are issues to be fixed, based on the output of the external service So AFAICT you can have both. And the warning/todo will be there only if, according to the clang toolchain, you have something to do on the package. Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli . . . . . . . z...@upsilon.cc . . . . o . . . o . o Maître de conférences . . . . . http://upsilon.cc/zack . . . o . . . o o Debian Project Leader . . . . . . @zack on identi.ca . . o o o . . . o . « the first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club »
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
