On 13/11/12 at 10:02 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > Assuming that the "users" of udd-bugs.sql are only users of the > according script clone_udd_bugs_fetch.sh switching the compression > method seems pretty cheap. This might be different for general udd.sql. > So despite the inconsistency between the compression method of the > different data dumps I do not see any drawback in reducing the size by > close to 50%.
My concern is only about udd.sql. Do as you want for udd-bugs.sql. L. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121113090845.ga26...@xanadu.blop.info
