On 14 July 2012 00:50, Lucas Nussbaum <lu...@debian.org> wrote: > Note that it is not clear if it is really the responsibility of the new > maintainer to take care of stable bugs.
Mmm; although I'm not sure what the consensus is on this, I think it is reasonable that the 'sid' version of Maintainer takes precedence. The BTS will send stable bugs to the new maintainer, rather than the one in stable. > Also, in the case of a removed package > that is still in stable, it is clearly the responsibility of the 'stable > maintainer' to take care of issues. > > I would rather have a checkbox (disabled by default) that would say "also > include all related source packages, not just those maintained in sid > and experimental". My preference would be to avoid as many checkboxes as possible. Yes, there are some edge cases, but I thought this patch might help flush them out. ;) (I wonder what should happen when a package changes maintainer, but then gets removed from unstable? Not very common.) Another interesting set of packages would be NMUs, where the uploader is responsible for any issues caused by the NMU. -- Tim Retout <dioc...@debian.org> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cadc0ge--73equjgdbwrytz9rfz-0u1fczfptkjvfehnjszb...@mail.gmail.com
