On 29/06/12 at 21:24 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi, > > I checked some examples and here there is one > > udd=# SELECT source, version, release, distribution from sources where source > = 'emboss' ; > source | version | release | distribution > --------+-----------------+-------------------+------------------ > emboss | 6.1.0-5 | squeeze | debian > emboss | 6.3.1-6~bpo60+1 | squeeze-backports | debian > emboss | 6.3.1-6~bpo60+1 | squeeze | debian-backports > emboss | 6.3.1-6 | wheezy | debian > emboss | 6.4.0-2 | sid | debian > (5 Zeilen) > > udd=# SELECT source, unstable_version, unstable_upstream, > unstable_parsed_version, unstable_status from dehs where source = 'emboss' ; > source | unstable_version | unstable_upstream | unstable_parsed_version | > unstable_status > --------+------------------+-------------------+-------------------------+----------------- > emboss | 6.3.1 | 6.4.0 | 6.3.1 | > outdated > (1 Zeile) > > Any reason why DEHS considers emboss outdated?
UDD gets its DEHS data from http://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/udd-dehs. That contains: - debian-mangled-uversion: 6.3.1 debian-uversion: 6.3.1 package: emboss status: Newer version available upstream-url: ftp://emboss.open-bio.org/pub/EMBOSS/EMBOSS-6.4.0.tar.gz upstream-version: 6.4.0 So it's DEHS that thinks that the current Debian version of emboss is 6.3.1, while it's 6.4.0. Lucas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120630072921.ga10...@xanadu.blop.info
