Tiago Bortoletto Vaz <ti...@debian.org> writes: > I'm with pabs about integrating it to qa.d.o, sounds really helpful :) > Btw, I've just checked a few links reported as error 500 and some seem > to not present any problem. See:
> http://sdl.perl.org/ > http://www.kuwata-lab.com/erubis/ > http://www.kuwata-lab.com/kwalify/ > http://www.pstoedit.net/ > http://www.rc0.org.uk/tdl/ One thing to be aware of with link checkers is that there are some sites that will return errors to bots but not to browsers. I don't know if that applies to any of these, but I see that a lot when running link checks against my own web sites. There are also just a lot of transient errors in the web, either due to temporary network problems or due to temporary server problems. It would probably be a good idea to cache results and only start warning if the site was consistently unreachable over a longer period, like a week. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87vckmfp4g....@windlord.stanford.edu
