On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 11:34:45AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > No. Not that I would know of. I did the updates by
> >
> > psql udd < sql/upgrade.sql
>
> Arg, sql/upgrade.sql is a way to document the changes that should be
> done to another instance, and should not be used that way, since it
> recreates the whole DB.
> I hope that other changes were not undone....
Well, to be more precise the line above was a bit short. I did not
piped the full sql/upgrade.sql code into psql udd but I rather used the
last part which was specifically containing those parts that concerned
the description-less packages files. To be even more precise:
Everything that comes past
-- 2012-01-23
-- description-less packages files
ALTER TABLE packages add description_md5 text;
ALTER TABLE ubuntu_packages add description_md5 text;
ALTER TABLE derivatives_packages add description_md5 text;
DROP VIEW all_packages;
ALTER TABLE packages DROP COLUMN long_description;
...
was executed.
When looking at it the GRANT statement after recreating the view is
really missing.
Should I re-add it (since you seem to have removed it yesterday)?
BTW, due to a lack of (easy to find?) documentation I simply assumed
that upgrade.sql would serve the purpose to remind the maintainer of UDD
what needs to be taken over into setup.sql. Because I did not want to
do any harm I executed only those bits I have added personally which
seemed the most safe approach to me.
It would help to document the usage of this file in some kind of header.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120329111015.ga21...@an3as.eu
