Hi! On Mon, 2011-07-04 at 18:11:37 +0200, Christoph Berg wrote: > We don't distinguish unstable and experimental anymore in the DEHS > setup; the "up to date" messages is what uscan outputs when passed a > version number (which we take from unstable). At the moment I don't > think a separate setup for experimental would be worth it.
I expect not distinguishing unstable from experimental will affect some packages that are shipping different watch files on each, I'm at least aware of svgalib. If the feature is not going to be restored then it probably makes sense to remove the Exp column from the PTS to avoid confusion. thanks, guillem -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20111005051827.gc24...@gaara.hadrons.org
