On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 02:17:49PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> It would be better to have both a array-ifed version of the field, and a
> text version of the field, in the packages table. That way,
> compatibility is preserved. Patch welcomed.
Uhmm, that sounds a bit redundant. I just implemented a query in my
script for the Blends pages where I use
function(text[], text[])
where $1 is something like '{"pkg1","pkg2",...,"pkgn"}' and $2 is
rendered as '{"%pkg1%","%pkg2%",...,"%pkgn%"}' by the Pythonscript which
calles the function. This is not elegant but works somehow. I'm not very
motivated to write a more elegant function for the Blends pages at the cost
of a quite redundant packages table. So leaving it as is seems acceptable
to me.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110123133124.ga27...@an3as.eu
