Hello all, during Summer I adopted the package Twofish, releasing it as twofish_0.3-2. However, I judged the time ripe to declare the code stable enough to produce a separate package with a shared library, in addition to the static library that Branden Robinson maintained for a really extended time period.
Since the binary package with the shared library was new, the whole set passed through NEW before getting accepted unsuspectedly quick. However, locking at http://packages.qa.debian.org/t/twofish.html the whole package history was erased at the same time. Is this acceptable or should some counter action be taken? Within shortly I will update the documentation somewhat as well as policy standards , but otherwise no changes are waiting to be made. Best regards, Mats Erik Andersson, fil. dr -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101019220303.ga5...@mea.homelinux.org
