Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > I'm not sure of the problem here. It can either be: > - In the dehs table, UDD shows the unstable_version as provided by DEHS, > which, due to synchronization delays, might not be the latest one in > unstable. => I don't think that this should be fixed
Not a sync problem, DEHS has the same version too. > - DEHS is not aware that there can be multiple versions in unstable. > => This totally should be fixed DEHS is aware of that and normally uses the latest version it finds. By taking a look at the code, there is a bug when handling epochs, which *is* the case. The results of the query provided by Andreas first confused me, because I though there was no epoch at all and that that was not the bug. Will fix it in a moment. Cheers, -- Raphael Geissert - Debian Developer www.debian.org - get.debian.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/i3f7p6$kr...@dough.gmane.org
