On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 08:00:42PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: > On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 20:42:35 +0100 Mike Hommey wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 08:27:53PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: > > > On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 19:53:48 +0100 Mike Hommey wrote: > [...] > > > > New graphs are available on http://merkel.debian.org/~glandium/bts/ > > > > > > They look nice! > > > They even look correct and in sync with the PTS, at least from some > > > random checks! > > I keep taking a look at those unofficial graphs, from time to time. > > On a second thought, there's something that I don't especially like in > them, from an esthetic point of view. > > If I compare them with the current official graphs, I notice a number > of cosmetic differences: many of them look like an enhancement to me, > but two of them seem to be a regression. > > The first change I don't like is that the background grid is now made > up of dotted lines, rather than of solid lines. > I would prefer solid lines: I think they make the graph more readable. > > The second change I don't appreciate too much is that the background > grid seems to have horizontal lines for integral values of the vertical > axis (which makes sense), but also for half steps (which does not make > sense to me: the number of bugs is always an integer, may a package > have 14.5 bugs? I guess it cannot...). > I would prefer having fewer horizontal lines (at most one for each > integral value of the vertical axis), since having too many horizontal > lines makes the graph hard to read. > > I hope that constructive criticism may be helpful... :-)
I wouldn't mind someone searching for the appropriate rrd flags to make that happen ;) Please note that those on people.d.o already show for half steps, but those on merkel show more. See http://people.debian.org/~glandium/bts/n/nss.png vs. http://merkel.debian.org/~glandium/bts/n/nss.png for example Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100718093456.ga3...@glandium.org
