Stefano Zacchiroli schrieb am Sunday, den 23. May 2010: > On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 12:32:47PM +0200, Ricardo Mones wrote: > > > So? NMUs are not only for serious bugs. > > > > Then, as Ana said, the developers reference should be changed because > > that's just the opposite of the first point in 5.11.1 "When and how to do > > an NMU": «Does your NMU really fix bugs? Fixing cosmetic issues or > > changing the packaging style in NMUs is discouraged.» > > No, logics fails here. Between serious bugs and cosmetic issues there's > a huge range of possibilities. > > For instance, NMU are allowed for important bugs (see the suggested > upload delays in devref §5.11.1) and fixing those does not qualify as > making cosmetic changes; well, at least it does not according to my own > interpretation of it. Things like "adding a homepage field, fiddling with debhelper compat stuff" and so on does not count as bug fixing for me, especialy if there is no open bug for it.
Alex -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100523104910.gc16...@lisa.snow-crash.org
