On 20/02/10 at 16:29 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 03:51:49PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > I'd say use derivatives_*, since the number of affected packages is > > going to be very small. > > OK, this was also my preference. > > Meta-Comment: We need some way to document such things for UDD - or > missed I something?
it's documented, since it's now in the mailing list archives, no? :) -- | Lucas Nussbaum | lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100220163822.gb4...@xanadu.blop.info
