On 20/10/09 at 10:27 +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote: > On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 10:24, Olivier Berger > <olivier.ber...@it-sudparis.eu> wrote: > > Le lundi 19 octobre 2009 à 21:18 +0200, Sandro Tosi a écrit : > > > >> <morph> lucas: hi! is there a place in UDD where pseudo-packages are > >> stored? It doesn't seems so > >> <lucas> no > >> <morph> lucas: do you think a table for them only would be usefult? > >> <lucas> what's your definition of pseudo-packages? > >> <morph> lucas: objects like 'wnpp', 'wiki.d.o' and all the others defined > >> in BTS not present as source/bin packgae > >> <morph> lucas: > >> http://bugs.debian.org/pseudopackages/pseudo-packages.description > >> <morph> lucas: my need is that querying bugs, they come up, but there's no > >> table describing them > >> <lucas> ok > >> <lucas> sounds like a good idea to add such a table > >> <lucas> maybe directly in the bugs importer > >> <morph> lucas: I'm going to report a bug report on this, just to don't > >> forgive about that; I'll try to work on UDD a bit > >> > > > > Shouldn't this be a property of the packages in their own table instead > > of another table ? > > pseudo-packages are just a name and a description; they are ~20 > instead of several 1000s of packages (either source or binary, you > didn't specify). So they are quite different objects, and a different > table seems in need instead of adding a column in other tables jsut to > differentiate very few lines that will have none of the other > attributes.
I agree. also, we can't add that to the packages table, since they are not real packages. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
