On 23/09/09 at 17:35 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > On Wed, 23 Sep 2009, Willi Mann wrote: > > > I suggest someone rewrites > > > http://svn.debian.org/viewsvn/qa/trunk/data/ddpo/ldap2bugstxt?revision=2124&view=markup > > > with UDD and/or the BTS SOAP interface. > > > > I could do that if someone sends me the output of the current script. Is > > UDD or SOAP preferred? > > UDD will be more effective I think (doing it with SOAP would require too > many queries AFAIK). The generated data file is: > http://qa.debian.org/data/ddpo/results/bugs.txt
Hi, I wrote a cgi that outputs the bugs data in the DDPO format. http://udd.debian.org/cgi-bin/ddpo-bugs.cgi The bugs data in UDD is updated at: 0 1,7,13,19 * * * $UAR bugs (the system runs in UTC). Fetching the data one hour after that would be fine. I've checked that it gives reasonable results compared to the bts2ldap output. (I've also fixed that fact that UDD didn't know about src:foo bugs yet, the data might not reflect that depending on when you look at the output). Aba, what do you think? Do you want to continue to maintain bts2ldap, or should we switch to UDD? -- | Lucas Nussbaum | lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
