On 30/07/09 at 17:16 +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote: > On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 01:47:23PM +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote: > > Hi, > > > Experimental is a development resource and not a dump for packages that > > should not be in unstable/testing. Abusing it sounds like a bad idea, so > > IMO think the current regime with a tad (but not overly) more aggressive > > removal once orphaned packages are more easily accessible seems like a > > good idea. > > ACK. It feels wrong to have in exeprimental a mix of orphaned packages and > stuff under strong developement. > > IMHO it would be nice to aim at a release without oraphaned packages.
That's totally unrealistic. > Though with the discussion of a freeze in Dec. this might be ambious. > One has to see where it produces complains from other devs and users > when orphaned packages start to be missing on a larger scale. > > Would it make sense to create a list of orphaned packages and start > with blocking them from entering testing (e.g. add a bug of RC priority) > and subsequently remove them, including reverse deps, from testing? > Or has someone already made such lists and played with something like this? There's no complete list like you describe, since it's A LOT of work to analyze each orphaned package. (I'd like to encourage you to start working on analyzing some orphaned packages -- the full list doesn't need to be done by the same person). The reason why I think that moving some of the orphaned packages to experimental is a good idea, is because often, you run into packages that are still useful to a small number of users, have no alternative, still basically work, but have been orphaned for >2 years with nobody willing to maintain them. In that case, we should not release with such packages, but it should still be available (though unsupported) to the users. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org