On 28/07/09 at 10:05 +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote: > Personally, I don't like to close automatically WNPP bugs (ITP/RFP). > Probably the best move is to retitle ITP to RFP after a certain amount > of time (like 1 year of inactivity, as used by that script) and leave > it there.
The problem here is that an open ITP sends the message that someone is actively working on the package, which might prevent someone else (more active) to work on the package instead. Except in some rare cases, I don't think that it should take more than 3 months to get a package into Debian. So retitling ITPs to RFPs after 3 or 6 months is probably enough. As for keeping RFPs open vs closing them, I don't really care. RFPs are pretty useless anyway. - Lucas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
