Loïc Minier wrote: > On Mon, Dec 22, 2008, Adeodato Simó wrote: >> it is also with ideas like this that i regret that our policy process >> won't allow for a top-down flow of recommendations. imho this would be a >> nice use for it, once consensus was be reached that this is a good idea. > > The good thing is that lintian people are quite open to clever changes; > this gives us immediately: > - a mean to test a package > - a mean to tell maintainers about it (if they run lintian) and hence > put the actual work on their side > - an up-to-date db of the affected packages (lintian.d.o) >
So, what exactly should be checked? and what's the status of this proposal? Cheers, -- Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintainer www.debian.org - get.debian.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org