Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 22, 2008, Adeodato Simó wrote:
>> it is also with ideas like this that i regret that our policy process
>> won't allow for a top-down flow of recommendations. imho this would be a
>> nice use for it, once consensus was be reached that this is a good idea.
> 
>  The good thing is that lintian people are quite open to clever changes;
>  this gives us immediately:
>  - a mean to test a package
>  - a mean to tell maintainers about it (if they run lintian) and hence
>    put the actual work on their side
>  - an up-to-date db of the affected packages (lintian.d.o)
> 

So, what exactly should be checked? and what's the status of this proposal?

Cheers,
-- 
Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintainer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to