Hello Simó, On Fri, 7 Nov 2008 18:40:14 +0100 Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Fri, 07 Nov 2008 00:01:27 +0100]: > > > Hello, > > Hello J. This is a small bug in the vzctl and vzquota packages. You may > want to send a report against these packages (for information on > reporting bugs, see <http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting>). Thanks, then I just forward this one answer to submit at bugs debian. My best, Joyce > > This is little annoyance, but frequent, so I wish to point to it here : > > > My source.list is this one: > > *************************** > > deb http://ftp.univ-pau.fr/linux/mirrors/debian testing main contrib > > non-free deb-src http://ftp.univ-pau.fr/linux/mirrors/debian/ testing > > main contrib non-free > > > deb http://security.debian.org/ lenny/updates main contrib non-free > > #deb-src http://security.debian.org/ lenny/updates main contrib > > > *************************** > > > I'm going to install theses: > > > *************************** > > > # LANG=C apt-get install linux-headers-2.6.26-1-openvz-686 > > linux-image-2.6.26-1-openvz-686eglantier:/home/claude-helene > > Reading package lists... Done > > Building dependency tree > > Reading state information... Done > > The following extra packages will be installed: > > iproute linux-headers-2.6.26-1-common-openvz linux-kbuild-2.6.26 > > vzctl vzquota Suggested packages: > > iproute-doc linux-doc-2.6.26 linux-patch-openvz kernel-patch-openvz > > Recommended packages: > > libatm1 rsync > > The following NEW packages will be installed: > > iproute linux-headers-2.6.26-1-common-openvz > > linux-headers-2.6.26-1-openvz-686 linux-image-2.6.26-1-openvz-686 > > linux-kbuild-2.6.26 vzctl vzquota 0 upgraded, 7 newly installed, 0 to > > remove and 64 not upgraded. Need to get 24.8MB/25.3MB of archives. > > After this operation, 85.7MB of additional disk space will be used. > > Do you want to continue [Y/n]? n > > Abort. > > > ************************* > > > I wonder what are linux-patch-openvz kernel-patch-openvz so I > > "apt-cache show" on them, then I try to see if they are available: > > > ************************* > > > # LANG=C apt-get install linux-patch-openvz > > Reading package lists... Done > > Building dependency tree > > Reading state information... Done > > Package linux-patch-openvz is not available, but is referred to by > > another package. > > This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or > > is only available from another source > > E: Package linux-patch-openvz has no installation candidate > > > > # LANG=C apt-get install kernel-patch-openvz > > Reading package lists... Done > > Building dependency tree > > Reading state information... Done > > Package kernel-patch-openvz is not available, but is referred to by > > another package. > > This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or > > is only available from another source > > E: Package kernel-patch-openvz has no installation candidate > > > > ************************ > > > They are not : why keep them in the suggested packages ? Shouldn't it > > be removed from there ? > > > My best greetings, > > J.M > > > > -- > Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es > Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org > > Love in your heart wasn't put there to stay. > Love isn't love 'til you give it away. > -- Oscar Hammerstein II > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
